For some time, politicians have been avoiding the topic of how far they will go in handing the children over to the father. The situation here speaks for itself. Whilst the article does not draw attention to previous cases like this, it is not uncommon for courts to allow convicted sex offenders unsupervised contact with children. For as long as the courts, family reporters and children's lawyers rely upon the junk science of Parental Alienation Syndrome(also referred to as "Parent Alienation"), cases like these will continue to rupture the lives of children.

For some time, politicians have been avoiding the topic of how far they will go in handing the children over to the father. The situation here speaks for itself. Whilst the article does not draw attention to previous cases like this, it is not uncommon for courts to allow convicted sex offenders unsupervised contact with children. For as long as the courts, family reporters and children's lawyers rely upon the junk science of Parental Alienation Syndrome(also referred to as "Parent Alienation"), cases like these will continue to rupture the lives of children.

Pedophile granted child custody
Article from:
Font size:Decrease Increase
Email article:Email
Print article:Print
DAVID NANKERVIS
June 13, 2009 11:30pm
A FAMILY Court judge has granted custody of four children to their father - a convicted pedophile and rapist.
The mother of the four youngsters, all aged under 15, requested custody at a recent Family Court hearing in Adelaide.
The unsuccessful application was made not long after the children's father was found guilty in the Adelaide District Court of multiple sex offences against a minor.
A transcript of the Family Court hearing shows the presiding judge was aware of the father's convictions and that he was on bail awaiting sentencing.
Further details, including the names of the family, cannot be legally reported. The mother and her current husband also both have criminal records.
However, child support groups have condemned the idea that a convicted pedophile could be granted custody of any child.
Victim Support Service SA said the community would be "alarmed" at a situation where a pedophile was allowed to care for children.
"Our organisation would be worried too about that, and we would want to know about the reasoning and rationale behind such a decision and what steps are in place to protect any child in such circumstances," the service's chief executive Michael Dawson said.
"I would think it is inappropriate for someone with a previous history - through conviction of crimes against children - to be provided with the opportunity to supervise children.
"From my personal experience, I've never heard of any such case before."
The Australian Childhood Foundation also expressed serious concern about the risks pedophiles pose to children, particularly in an unsupervised environment.
"Convicted pedophiles can't work as a teacher, be a foster carer or footy coach, because society recognises that past behaviour is the best indicator of future risk," foundation chief executive Joe Tucci said.
"So as a matter of principal, children shouldn't be in unsupervised contact or custody of an adult with convictions for sexual assault against children."
Mr Tucci said courts should err on the side of caution and treat convictions of sexual assault against children as a "red light" when deciding what is in a child's best interest.
A spokeswoman for the Family Court said judges could only award custody of a child to those parties who applied for it.
"If a judge has concerns about a child's welfare, they cannot make an order that a child be put in the care of the state," the spokeswoman said.
"A judge can ask but not compel a state welfare department to intervene if they believe a child is at risk of abuse or neglect."
The Department of Families and Communities said the Family Court may advise it of any "child protection concerns (the court has) about a child".
"Families SA assesses the notification like any other and takes action if necessary," a department spokesman said.
"Also, the Family Court may make a formal request that the Department of Families and Communities become a party to a case.
"If DFC accepts the request and becomes a party, it then makes representations to the court about what is in the best interests of the child or children."

"All I ever wanted was supervised" a repeated phrase amongst family violence survivors. The Family Court has come under recent scrutiny over unsafe contact and the controversial use of Parental Alienation Syndrome a diagnosis that has not been accepted by any scientific organization globally. The bottom line is that children are ordered by the court to attend access visits where the parents are abusive. If the mother objects, she risks losing the children altogether. That is the state of not only the Family Court in Australia, it is an international problem.

Until recently, there were few groups that were advocating for children and far too many groups advocating for such forced contact. "Pro Contact" culture is really just being polite. "Contact No Matter what" Cult, is more appropriate considering the facts that there is no limit as to who they wish children to have contact with.

Cult definitions coined from 1920 onward^[1] refer to a cohesive social group and their devotional beliefs or practices, which the surrounding population considers to be outside of mainstream cultures. The surrounding population may be as small as a neighborhood, or as large as the community of nations. They gratify curiosity about, take action against, or ignore a group, depending on its reputed similarity to cults previously reported by mass media. -Wikipedia

Bizarre punishments against mothers are initiated by the courts if they do not comply without consideration for the impact that the children suffer.

Some of these punishments include:

"Isolating The Child From The Protective Parent"

"Orders inhibiting the Child From access to Counseling"

"Removal of The Mothers Passport'

In cases where the parent has a mental health condition that is one of the leading causes of homicide, the protective action is often minimal. Some orders are for the parent to take their medication and see their doctor, but left entirely to the device of the patient and the potential victims are left restricted by the court order and helpless to what might come about. The Court evaluators who make the decisions that the judges often solely rely on are often untrained for these cases, but overtrained in the area of "pro - contact' and too well understand the terms of "maternal gatekeeping" "Alienation" and "False Memory Syndrome". They believe that the child is not unsafe in relationships with sex offenders if they "just accept it" without the interference from mothers.

This is due to the fact that in the early 80s, Dr Richard Gardner coined the term, "Parent Alienation Syndrome" and travelled the world with the help of Association of Family and Conciliation Courts(AFCC). Many conferences were held indoctrinating lawyers, psychologists and judges into the belief that children are better off with abusive parents. This belief was also supported by the international Child Emancipation, a lobby group for pedophiles.

Cases where there is not enough evidence to support Family Violence are often referred to as, "False Allegations" and in most cases the victim is required to pay costs to the alleged perpetrator. This goes against studies that support the notion that in 95% of child abuse cases are true. Clearly it is the interference that the victims receive during the court processes that leads to the lack of evidence that is able to be provided.

Like the German Lebensborn organization, they said, "Best Interests" but the intention was to reintroduce laws that tie women to men and diminish any concerns regarding child abuse and violence against women. The current family law regime reduces the value of children and mothers compared to men and promotes the cycle of violence continuing through to another generation. Like a genetic disease, our children have been infected with family violence.

The German Lebensborn organization was similarly cruel in its time. In the context of the German welfare system, it was considered that it was the "best interests" of the child to be German. By abducting babies of other origins for German families, "Best Interests of the child" was created to serve the purposes of racial intolerance. Today in the context of Family Law, "best interests of the child" refers to the amount of time spent with a parent no matter how abusive they may be.

Although there have been more efforts to protect mothers and children affected by family violence with the Violence Against Women Act and the introduction of the Protective Parent Bill, PAS is still alive in the US court system and have progressed to a point where they are supporting it through the "Responsible Fatherhood Bill". Like best Interests, it is aimed at enforcing contact with fathers regardless of the rise to epidemic proportions of murder suicides. In sect 2, "Findings" it states that the reason to provide fathers with billions of dollars in funding is due to:

6) Children who live without contact with their biological father are, in comparison to children who have such contact--

(A) 5 times more likely to live in poverty;

(B) more likely to bring weapons and drugs into the classroom;

(C) twice as likely to commit crime;

(D) twice as likely to drop out of school;

(E) more likely to commit suicide;

(F) more than twice as likely to abuse alcohol or drugs; and

(G) more likely to become pregnant as teenagers.

(7) Violent criminals are overwhelmingly males who grew up without fathers.

The findings stated here is derived from a confirmitory bias. If you look deeper into the research, it becomes obvious that:

Children were economically abused by the fathers and the state for withdrawal of financial support of children. It is in fact written in the convention on The Rights Of The Child:

Article 26

1. States Parties shall recognize for every child the right to benefit from social security, including social insurance, and shall take the necessary measures to achieve the full realization of this right in accordance with their national law.

2. The benefits should, where appropriate, be granted, taking into account the resources and the circumstances of the child and persons having responsibility for the maintenance of the child, as well as any other consideration relevant to an application for benefits made by or on behalf of the child.

The "Violent males who grew up without fathers", were in fact infected prior to the separation by witnessing the actual violence. According to Amy Coha:

Boys who witness domestic violence are more likely to batter their female partners as adults than boys raised in nonviolent homes. Of the children who witness domestic abuse, 60% of the boys eventually become batterers.
Sixty-three percent of boys age 11-20 who commit homicide, murder the man who was abusing their mother. In 50% of the time, if the wife (mother) is being physically abused, so are the children.

Teenage pregnancy is an old sexist phrase that draws the need to look at the pregnant women as the problem. Contraceptives apart from the condom are directed at her as entirely responsible for the pregnancy. According to Rape Abuse and Incest Network(RAIN):

Girls ages 16-19 are 4 times more likely than the general population to be victims of rape, attempted rape, or sexual assault.

Victims of sexual assault are:⁷

3 times more likely to suffer from depression.

6 times more likely to suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder.

13 times more likely to abuse alcohol.

26 times more likely to abuse drugs.

4 times more likely to contemplate suicide.

The fact that in some states, the perpetrator can apply to the Family Court to stop the abortion and continue these attacks on her suggests that women and girls are considered by the state as objects rather than human beings. If such a bill were to pass, it would be a greater violation to the already eroded human rights of women and children.

Claudine Dombrowski was sentenced to jail by the Shawnee Courts for publicizing her injustice among many. We ask you to circulate the evidence she has obtained to as many sites online as possible. You Can Download videos www.kissyoutube.com. She may be forced to remove it, but they cannot force you if you keep it online. By keeping it public, they cannot hurt her as everybody knows that this court has been persecuting a DV victim for breaking the silence. They isolated her daughter from seeing her mother to gain control and profit. They do not want you to know what they did to her. Why? Because they know it is a crime.

Shawnee County Courts: Mom Guilty- Contempt and further ordered to remove “Public Records”

Shawnee County Courts: Mom Guilty- Contempt and further ordered to remove “Public Records”

A Human Rights Issue-Custody...

Remember that little thang called the US Constitution…???

U.S. Constitution

“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world;

indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.” -Margaret Mead (1901-1978

[The Courts, Shawnee County, Kansas, were more concerned about THEIR images – and here- than those of my daughter –the ‘contempt’ that I was convicted of..? Civilly -without rule- of procedure of same- criminal- So when does civil become criminal..? Doesn’t jail or per say the 4^th amendment speaks ‘civil; may have jury-(no silence-oppression) if ‘value exceeds twenty dollars”---yeah, would make a ‘mad’ man-...’mad.’... as a ‘hatter’ indeed-hence, this blog post- sanity –dignity-social activism-true change. Confused..? Wait.. ..this is the …sane part- it gets better….]

“Today is my Birthday, birthdays are really for the ‘mothers’ (I learned after the birth of my dear daughter) as we recall the birth with perfect clarity… this is my first b-day- since my own mom’s passing a few months ago- her death in the ‘feeding’ frenzy of the Courts and their court whores who will not even in death stop their crimes against ‘humanity’. My ‘contempt’ was because of the video I made- the ‘preservation’ of good- sacred’.

“Today, I had a very precious few minutes with my daughter via mobile-(the first time she was able to say ‘happy birthday mom) her little heart so weary, painfully heavy but; a strong compassionate heart it is. She takes after her grandmother. We……. survived another ‘court feeding’….. Next feeding….April 15^th, 2009 at 3:00 PM…..we will survive that too……

“Today, with my mom, my daughter and this b-day seems so much more ‘raw’ I feel as I know my daughter does-and so many others- like all my nerve endings are exposed-perhaps they are- and either 15 days-or fifteen years- the ‘stripping’ of rights- especially ‘human’ …there simply are no words, other than it must stop… via the system that profits so heavily from so much spilled blood.. the nation… indeed the world.. et ‘humanity’ its self….

“Today, I continue- the ‘path-un-paved’- happy b-day mom, it is-the beginning- to and end…’Human Evolution’-higher intelligence- -that I try to form my thoughts as each action I take or inaction- each step I take is to ‘free’ my child her children- from the blood lust of the ‘family courts’ globally…”

-I am my mother’s daughter-and- my daughter’s mother-

I was lucky to find the tribute video for repost to this blog- We have a ‘code of honor’- my sisters-www.BatteredMothersCustodyConference.org

When one is silenced, we speak for her- we speak for all our children - - we just act and ‘do’ as a ‘human’ would. We carry our dead and our wounded- we leave no one behind. [marine motto-human motto]

This because of the death and tribute of my mother-my daughter’s grandmother-

From the ‘on-line PUBLIC ACCESS’ of case No. 96D217 (but wait- I am now Ordered to remove PUBLIC DOCUMENTS as well)

04/06/2009

-

MISC.

Petitioner in person and by Donald Hoffman. Respondent in person and by Robert E. Duncan. G.A.L., Jill Dykes, for minor child who is not present. Court Reporter: Digital Div. 13.

Respondent withdraws motion for recusal of Judge.

Court considers evidence offered through affidavit and stipulations of the parties and after listening to arguments of counsel, finds that Judge Johnson on September 27, 2006, ordered "Respondent to withdraw any and all likenesses of the minor child over which she had control that may be appearing on the internet or other public places or public access and further that Respondent was ordered not to present child at public rallies, demonstrations, newscast or otherwise publicize the child's name or likeness in furtherance of Respondent's efforts in the instant case".

Court found;

1.) based on incidents detailed in the affidavit and the stipulations of the parties that Respondent had violated the Court's order by intentionally placing photographs of the minor child on Respondent's

website and to links accessible through the Respondent's website and to websites that the Respondent was either maintaining or contributing to;

2. ) that as of April 4, 2009, the photographs of the minor child were still accessible;

3. ) that as of April 6, 2009, the photographs were not accessible.

Court finds Respondent to be in Indirect Contempt. In mitogation, Respondent offers that photos were part of a family tribute to her deceased mother.

Court fines Respondent $1,500 and orders her to serve 30 days in jail.

Court allows Respondent to purge herself of the contempt by removing all photos, likenesses and name of minor child from the internet or any other public place or public access on which she has control by April 15, 2009, at 3:00 p.m.

Respondent is ordered to pay Petitioner's attorney fees of $600 for prosecuting the motion to show cause,

Respondent is ordered to obtain a psychological evaluation by a Psychiatrist.

Respondent is prohibited from filing any motions on her own unless the motion is signed by her attorney or she obtains permission of the Court prior to filing.

Parenting time as previously ordered - 2 hours supervised visitation per week through Odyssey Group. (these stopped when my mother died)

Respondent currently has a P.O. Box and does not wish to disclose her address.

Court ordered, and Respondent agrees, that any filing mailed to her P.O. Box shall be deemed personal service. R. Duncan to do JE. DBD

Ok, I feel better now.. silence is oppression- oppression is silence.

[imagine a world without links-darkness-give light the darkness will disappear of its own-shine bright]

1. Anonymums: Mother Heros:Claudine Dombrowski

- 9 visits - Apr 5

Claudine Dombrowski is an amazing human being. Her efforts to free her daughter from the cycle of abuse are tireless. An assumption I made when I read the ...
anonymums.blogspot.com/2009/03/mother-herosclaudine-dombrowski.html - 150k -