It is just before fathers day in Australia, a time when some of the greatest murder suicides have occurred. If you have to send your children away at this time, be sure to give them a big hug and tell them how much you love them - just in case. Celebrating fathers day needs to only apply to those that do not abuse such a title.
Fathers with a history of violence and mental health are the greatest killers of our children and their ex partners. The problem lies in the leaders we seek in government, business and corporations - the corporate psychopaths. They make our policies, dominate our industry and drive the economy into the multifaceted system that we use today. They are the reason why our mental hospitals are filled with victims of torture, cruelty and abuse. Psychopath was a diagnosis to describe our serial killers that reside in our jails, but more studies have revealed that they adapt to a society that is less tolerant to confrontational violence and thus succeed in the art of initiating tactically hidden physical violence within the workplace and at home.
In United Kingdom of which Australian law is based upon, new research shows that men abuse more, but women are more likely to be arrested and women use more weapons to protect themselves.
In United States where similar laws are ingrained, murder suicide has peaked over the years to the stage of epidemic proportions. This is because the family law trends that are currently being reviewed after the west-gate bridge tragedy shocked the nation originated there dating back to the early eighties when DR Richard Gardner held his conferences claiming that the major problem in "high- conflict"(a term often used to trivialize and conceal family violence) cases the mother was at fault for reporting and must be punished. Of course his language in establishing these conclusions was masqueraded in the realm of academia and whilst he officially coined the term, "Parental Alienation Syndrome", he specifically targeted women and children. His work was largely debunked in the scientific community, but in the family courts he was worshiped as an expert god on post separation research. His work was sensationalized as gospel in court reports and family law conferences. His fame gratified fathers rights groups and created the family court rackets that run in the US courts today. Accounts of bribery rings have hit the headlines over the years, but the chain of perverting the course of justice is yet to be fully unearthed. Suspicions of similar operations are amounting as reports of evidence being destroyed or as they liek to say, "missing" has been nearly every single case in Australia. These are some of the signs that the Family Court is far from being transparent, but may be due to the barrage of media attention that fathers groups have received over the years.
Ask any average Joe blow and they will tell you that men have had the worst deal in family courts and that women lie about child abuse and domestic violence. This is the biggest urban myth that has been circulated for over two decades - since fathers rights groups began. The plight of the noncustodial mother(often battered into giving up the children) has been largely ignored and sometimes even scrutinized as though it were her fault for being beaten. Again, the perpetrators have won yet another ticket away from the exposure of the spotlight whilst the victim is left to deal with the aftermath. If you are a mother going to the family courts right now in Australia, expect to be shafted, silenced, humiliated and legally degraded to the status of a glorified babysitter if the father allows you such a privilege. This is the daily going ons to the the court unless you have or your children have been beaten so badly that no one can conceal it. The legal definition for "mother" in family law, usually refers to doormat. It is not really fatherhood we need to be worried about, its is motherhood and her concerns for the children that are in crisis. Cases where mothers and children that are being protected are now currently being flaunted as trophies on the family court website in hope that the general public will be apathetic in digging deeper. Even the search function is designed so that it will be difficult for you to find cases where the the parent has murdered the childs sibling. Before they provided a "do not allow google bot" script, I was able to find such a case. It was disturbing to read that the family court reporter had scrutinized her for denying access to the father who was in prison for bashing to death her three week old baby. I was appalled to learn that even after the judge had stated, "I do not think it is appropriate for this child to have contact with the man who murdered his younger brother", he had decided to allow the opportunity for this to be reconsidered after the murderer was released from jail. Do you think that either the child or the mother are going to feel safe conducting future handovers with a man who has been in prison for the murder of the younger sibling? It is why this case is more difficult to search as the pressures of the outside community beginning to learn how insanely cruel this court has become are amounting.
The mentality in the closed court doors is brutal towards women and children, perhaps an indicator that the culture has become somewhat a psychopaths paradise. The best way to counter such a culture may not be within the laws itself, nor from the constant campaigns from victims advocates, but in the mental health system. If there were a major overhaul in the mental health system where its triage targeted people that posed a significant harm to the community instead of the victims, we would have a decline in workplace bullying, domestic violence and child abuse.
One of the most significant benefits that the mental health system has is the ability to detain someone without their permission based on three factors:
- They pose a threat to themselves or others
- They are rejecting treatment.
- They are unwell.
The perpetrator cannot use the money that they ruthlessly acquired to perverse the course of justice and from inside jail(where human rights heavily monitor) proceed vexatious and frivolous court proceedings. Most of the drugs used in psychiatry usually sedate patients and thus converting a potential danger into a living zombie. The justice system has never really been well structured to appropriately address behavior as much as the mental health system has.
The following mental illnesses are currently not a priority, but reaking havoc on our community:
- Psychopath
- Narcissism
- Borderline
- Paranoia
If these became a mental health priority, the community would have the following benefits:
- More stable workplaces
- A decline in homegrown terrorism
- A stable economy
- Reduced costs in health and thus less insurances costs all round
- Reduction in violence against women and children
- Low crime rates
- More transparency in organizations and institutions
- Decrease in incidents of workplace bullying
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment