A father who received shared parenting of the children:
1. Left a 14yo and 9yo alone in the home to see his girlfriend regularly.
2. Threatened to deprive them of their mother, if they told.
3. Took all of the furniture out of the house, leaving them with a few clothes and blankets.
4. Is relying on depression as an excuse of his negligence.
In the article, it states:
"Duty solicitor Mark Dollimore said the man was suffering depression, had not felt able to look after his children, and wanted to co-operate as much as he could."
Then why did he go to the Family Court and battle it out for Shared Parenting?
Just to hurt mum
Why would he leave them in such poor conditions?
Just to hurt mum
If he could not have cared for them, why didn't he just phone the mother?
Oh.. that's right, he is busy hurting the mother.
Fact is that the Family Court has been and is continually used as a weapon against mothers resulting in the harm of children.
The people who made the shared parenting laws are bitter angry fathers who wanted the legal power to hurt not only their ex wives, but all mothers through the children. They see them as nothing more than a commodity or a tool to use and spout their hatred for all women.
Through the same charm and wit they used to lure these women into destructive environments, they used to promote this bill.
Hence every mother who goes through this system, is forced to endure the suffering this shared parenting mob inflicted.
The question is not how much suffering every mother can endure knowing that her children are at risk or are being abused and neglected. The question is now, what is the government going to do about it? How long do they have to endure this genocide? How many idiots are they going to listen to before we are heard?
No matter how much you try to bury the truth rather than act, it will not only shine through but be sure there will be justice.
Anonymums Family Violence Fact Sheet
Free Fact Sheet on Family Violence and Family Court
Posts
1 comment:
Same thing happening here. I didn't go through the court system, thinking it would be a waste of time, he'd get 50/50 anyway, so instead I agreed to a 'trial' of 60/40 (60% with me). Since this arrangement started a few months ago, he proceeded to tell me he "napped" in the afternoons, when questioned why, he said he had a pain in the neck and was taking strong pain medication, such as morphine. Since he sounded like he was 'boasting' in search for sympathy he missed the complete point of what I told him next. That it was totally unacceptable to be alone in the house with a 5 year old, unsupervised and on heavy pain medication. He doesn't get why I got angry at that? He only has her for 6 days a fortnight and for at least 1 of those on a weekend he spends asleep on the couch or in bed while his 5 year old is forced to wait for whatever activity he has promised to do with her and told to play the X-box and "leave him alone." He baulks that there is anything wrong with this, coz you know, he has depression and can't help it....:-0 I'm not even going to mention the lack of rules, such as not washing hands before dinner, and then dinner being a consistent serve of fish and chips, pizza, macaroni cheese, potato gems, McDonalds, KFC, or Fasta Pasta, all washed down with cake and ice-cream and soft-drinks and endless chocolate puddings.
Post a Comment