Fathers Rights at Parliament House

Fathers rights are at it again. After bullying an award winning journalist, making death threats to a blogger and pushing for laws that kill. They decide that it would be perfectly acceptable to walze up to parliament and provide the same rhetoric brought about in 2005, to propose yet more changes to the family law.

The question is not how far will they go to punish women and children but who will stop them?

Resembling the true state of Family Law, the forum was outnumbered by mens groups leaders. The ratio of mens rights versus children's rights was 4:1. There were no speakers advocating specifically for women despite most murder victims that occur before, during and after family law proceedings are women.

For speaking up against some of the laws that are harmful to children, Barbara Biggs has become the new target.

Past Targets were:

Michael Flood

Katherine Swinbourne

Pru Goward

What is most outrageous is that she is not against fathers and also advocates for fathers who have had children abused by mothers. Both mothers and fathers have become involved in her campaign and supported her. Her focus is purely on children, not mothers. What these groups do not realize is that fathers have experiences where their child is being abused by the mother or the stepfather and the same laws that exclude mothers from seeking protection also apply to fathers. Whilst the majority of protective parents are women, by no means does this not exclude men. This is because of gender based violence that has been recognized by the United Nations as a global problem not exclusive to class, race or culture. Violence against men is less prevalent, but does exist. The men who experience intimate partner violence are not attracted to mens rights groups because of its dominant culture.

Think about it: If you had just come out of a violent and controlling relationship, would you really want to go to a group that supports it?

In statistics globally, most violence perpetrated against men is by other men.

Also, in another illusion tactic, they have attempted to pin Barbara as one of the elite members of anonymums. Any intelligent reader would surely note the obvious differences in writing and opinion.

We would also like to thank our good friends whom are working internally within these groups to promote Anonymums, particularly our very good friend at "anti - misandry" who has brought many new recruits to our cause against those who wish to undermine the protections of women and children. These groups would very much like to distort the intentions of any group or person(s) that are against their monopoly and hate. They are often also haters of same sex couples and races that do not resemble white supremacy.