Lies Lies and more Lies




Court ruling 'right'

Article from: Sunday Herald Sun

Laurie Nowell

May 03, 2009 12:00am

THE death of Darcey Freeman cannot be blamed on the Family Court's handling of her family's break-up and the tragedy could not have been predicted, the court's Chief Justice says.
Negligence.  Its like how an insurance company requires that the employee Claim "No Liability" to avoid action.  If they sued, they would win.

All court transcripts related to the Freeman case have been reviewed by Chief Justice Diana Bryant.

Is that suppose to make it transparent?

She said that commentators had drawn conclusions of a causal link between the family law litigation, the parenting orders made and the shocking act in which Arthur Philip Freeman allegedly threw his daughter from the Westgate Bridge.

Court orders send people to jail if they do not comply.

"Examination of the circumstances revealed that the parties had ultimately reached their own agreement as to the care arrangements for the children," Chief Justice Bryant said.

Consent in the family courts is just like a rape case, its forced, threats are made and the protective parent submits - That's Family Court "Consent".

"It also emerged that the children had been living with both parents, by agreement, in a shared care arrangement for two years before (Darcey's death).

"For the past two years, the various authorities have been made aware of our fear for the safety of the children and, unfortunately, no one would listen," Mr Barnes said.

". . . I would say that having looked at the transcripts of the proceedings before the court, that nobody would have seen this coming."

Did you forget to mention that they were allegedly stolen from Diana Bryants unlocked car with NO surveillance? 

Chief Justice Bryant spoke to the Sunday Herald Sun as fathers' groups and anti-domestic violence organisations prepared to battle each other over changes to family law.

The mens movements were invited and men were there to support this.  The groups that don't support this are really the abusers lobby groups .

A new campaign, launched today, seeks to overturn recent Family Law Act amendments that enshrine "shared parenting" as a desirable outcome in family breakdowns.

Shared Parenting is the pathway for batterers to stalk through the courts and gain full custody.  Look at the number of noncustodial battered mothers in USA who began shared parenting in the 70s.  Shared Parenting is for the majority that have a civil situation where they do not need to access the courts.



No comments:

Has the Family Court Ignored

After the Family Court Battle, has the Father missed visitation for

Banners

Anonymums Blog Button

Get this button and link us to your blog, website or myspace page:

Step One
Copy(Ctrl +C) the following code :
Step Two
Paste(Ctrl+V) it onto your blog, website or myspace page.

I Support Anonymums Banner

Show your support on your blog, website or myspace page:

Step One
Copy(Ctrl +C) the following code :
Step Two
Paste(Ctrl+V) it onto your blog, website or myspace page.

Anonymums Family Violence Fact Sheet

Anonymums Family Violence Fact Sheet
Free Fact Sheet on Family Violence and Family Court

Should the Family Court have a Protective Parent BIll?

Breaking the Silence

Battered Mothers Custody Conference interviews

Bookmark and Share