Article from: 
- Font size:DecreaseIncrease
- Email article:Email
- Print article:Print
- Submit comment:Submit comment
April 17, 2009 12:00am
THE Family Court has issued several orders recently banning fathers from viewing pornography while caring for their children.
In the most recent case, Justice Sally Brown made the order in a custody dispute in which the mother alleged the father had sexually molested their six-year-old daughter.The father admitted to having downloaded a large collection of pornographic images off the internet from "teen sites", and having purchased online sex aids including a penis pump.
In 2005, the Department of Human Services investigated claims by the mother after her daughter did a drawing which she said showed the father wearing the pump while he abused the daughter. The girl was examined by doctors and seen by child psychologists
Justice Brown said she was not satisfied that the alleged sexual abuse had taken place.
"I do not doubt the mother believes, and has believed for some years, that the child has been sexually abused. No judgment of this court is likely to move her from that conviction."
The judge ordered that the father be prevented from bathing the child for six months to prevent him from facing further allegations and that the mother be prevented from taking the child for treatment for alleged sexual abuse without the written consent of the father.
Another recent case, involved a former teacher who left his job under a cloud after his school computer was found to contain pornography.
The court heard the mother had found pornographic images the husband left on the X-Box used by their children, aged five and seven.
Justice Garry Watts ruled the father's time with the children be supervised and that he be restrained from using or exposing his children to pornography during his time with them.
A third case involved a father who was a former member of the Defence Force who had been based for a time in Queensland and had been diagnosed with paraphilia, a preference for unusual sexual practices.
The court was told the father had been investigated by the online child sex exploitation team of the Australian Federal Police. He had also been caught peeping at women in a shower block at a military base and spying on the 13-year-old girl who lived next door.
While in this case, Deputy Chief Justice John Faulks made no order in relation to his pornographic collection, he did order that the man's time with his children be professionally supervised.
Share this articleWhat is this?
Posts
2 comments:
what's the problem about penis pump?It's better than a gun! Sexual health it's legal and very nice!
Did you read the article? This was done around children. I have published this comment so that any pedophiliac intentions can be monitored.
Post a Comment