Bruce Pardo, who dressed up as Santa and killed his ex wife amongst her nine guests on Christmas Eve
"I have to agree, Yuri. Whilst we here on this site can all understand what might have pushed this guy in that direction -to murder and suicide- in the end its a crime, especially when you consider that innocents were murdered. I'd be lying if I said that such extreme fantasies didn't cross my mind when I was being tortured by the system, the ex, the courts, community, and feminist organizations. More than once I felt like putting a stop to it in the most extreme ways imaginable. It may be that a majority of men in such an untenable position entertain such thoughts.” - Jason Thompson, Fathers4Equality
“Mr. Pardo lashed out at those responsible for, and the enablers of, the Misandry Machine so prevalent in today’s society. My thoughts are for Mr. Pardo, and not anyone else. He was backed into a corner and he fought back. Good for him. More men are waking up to the misandry. Mr. Pardo, you are my hero.” - Arden Linoge, Mens Activism
Danny Platt who murdered his two and a half year old baby son
“I appeared on the Al Rantel Show on KABC AM 790 in Los Angeles Monday night to discuss the horrific Danny Platt murder and the child support issue in general. I pointed out that the child support system has many flaws, chiefly its inflexibility in dealing with fathers who suffer drops in income or who get laid off. “- Glenn Sacks Fathers and Families
Sympathy and Excuses for Perpetrators An Excerpt from, “How the Fathers Rights Movement Betrays Victims and Protects Perpetrators” By Dr Michael Flood. This tendency is evident also in expressions of sympathy or justification for men who use violence against women and children in the context of family law proceedings. Over the past several decades, individual men have exacted violent revenge against the Family Court, their ex-partners and their children. They have committed murder-suicides, stabbed or shot ex-partners outside the Family Court, hired hit-men to kill their ex-wives, murdered a Family Court judge and the wife of another judge, bombed the home of another judge, and bombed a Family Court (Milburn, 1998). Men’s murders of their ex-wives and children and subsequent suicides have been justified by some spokesmen for men’s rights groups as understandable responses to the “raw deal” men get before the Family Court (Maddison, 1999, p. 39). For example, when a man in Perth gassed to death his three young children and then himself in 1998, following a Family Court ruling restricting his access to two weeks out of three, a spokesman for the Men’s Confraternity commented that he was “probably a decent, hard-working man who was pushed too far by the Family Court.”[1] When fathers’ rights groups acknowledge men’s violence against women and children, typically they ignore its impact on its targets and blame the violence on factors outside the men who perpetrate it: the Family Court, the Family Law Act, or the residential parent. Thus, “[i]n an ironic twist, male violence is used by these groups to demonstrate how victimised men are by the family law system” (Kaye & Tolmie, 1998, pp. 57-58). Indeed, fathers’ rights groups at times have used the threat of men’s violence against women and children to hold the community to ransom. They stress that unless family law is changed in line with their agendas, more women and children will die (and more men will kill themselves).
| Muslim Extremists | Men’s Rights Activists |
Muslims demand rape law reverse Bruce Loudon The Australian ONLY 10 days after Pakistan's military-led Government reformed the country's medieval rape and adultery laws, Islamabad appeared poised for a major backflip on the issue yesterday in an effort to pacify Islamic fundamentalists who have signed a fatwa against the historic changes. Hardline Pakistani religious leaders have labelled the reforms "un-Islamic, immoral and unconstitutional" and evidence of "Western values infiltrating society". In response, Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz has authorised the Pakistan Muslim League to negotiate with religious scholars and leaders of the powerful Islamic opposition alliance, the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA), over changes to the rape bill. The reforms to the rape laws were acclaimed by women's rights groups in Pakistan and around the world as an overdue change to a system that has long been regarded as an affront to civil liberties. But as much as it won global plaudits, and the firm backing of President Pervez Musharraf, the bill evoked fury among the Islamic fundamentalist parties that are supportive of the Taliban in Afghanistan, and are seen as a growing threat to the Pakistani Government in elections scheduled for next year. The MMA, which has strong representation in the central parliament and controls the legislatures in two key provinces, has threatened to lead a mass movement to depose the Government, sparking a serious rethink on the rape laws. Negotiations over the bill follow two days of fury in mosques across the country, with Muslim priests leading attacks on the changes, denouncing them for their "Western values" and attacking those who supported the reforms. Under the changes, complaints of rape and adultery will be dealt with under the country's civil penal code rather than under an obscure Islamic sharia ruling imposed in 1979 that demands that four male witnesses testify before a rape charge can be proved. Reports said yesterday that as part of the attempt to curb the gathering campaign against the rape law changes, police and paramilitary forces had ringed the headquarters of the fundamentalist Jamaat-e-Islami party in the Punjab capital of Lahore, where thousands of protesters led by the MMA were gathering to demonstrate against the changes to the legislation. A leader of the group said: "The MMA remains absolutely committed to stop these changes, and if necessary to bring about a change in the Government." | Children need. . . THIS? THE FATHERS RIGHTS MOVEMENT: IN THEIR OWN WORDS Liz Richards The Liz Library “Specifically, husbands no longer enjoy an assurance of a monogomous sexual relationship with the wife... not even a right to be informed of an abortion, much less a veto...” "The husband's claim on the wife's love is no longer recognized at all. Worse, it has been criminalized and is now known as "marital rape". WOLFGANG HIRCZY De MINO, Ph.D "[Sex offenders] ... could serve a USEFUL purpose to society also, by being ordered, and they would probably happily comply, to go out and rape and pillage all the damn man hating Feminaz's!!!!!!!!!!" GEORGE GILLILAND "We have forgotten that before we began calling this date rape... we called it exciting." as quoted in December 1977 Penthouse article, "Incest: The Last Taboo," by Philip Nobile A review of Women Can't Hear What Men Don't Say WARREN FARRELL, Ph.D. |
Posts
1 comment:
disgusting, but great post. they call us angry--whatever--at least we're not pedophiles and rape/murder apologists.
Post a Comment