Blinded by hatred for Mothers and Children

Its a tragedy to find yet another loss by not just a parent that was involved in the family court, but a father of three children who chose his only girl to die in agony after throwing her off the west gate bridge.  After Santa Clause and his rampage, the man who killed over child support and another who had killed  three month old baby.  They all fathered, they were all in family court battles and they were all reported in some way with a lot of undue sympathy, the type of sympathy that the mens movements try to convey do not exist.  

   As the souls of those children float into the air, so do our future children whilst the fathers rights movements rage on.  I have viewed a few blogs and it does not surprise me that they fail to address a worldwide tragedy and hide under the cloak of avoidence...waiting for  the next piece of news that compliments their world view that all mothers are bad and if their children say that they are bad thats because of their mothers.  No responsibility for their actions, just avoidance and hiding until they think that people have forgotten.   They know that its a matter of time until their time is up, when people will start asking why they believed such rubbish, but until then, the beatings continue until moral improves.

Some of these men will go to extreme lengths to distort victims experiences of abuse.  A well known example is Glenns distortions and propaganda about Jennifer Collins an adult who spoke of her experiences as a child abuse victim within the restraints of the family court.  Despite the fact that all of the evidence is up on the net along with being granted asylum by netherlands because america failed to protect her, Glenn Sacks writes aggressively that she is lying.  It is all to common the attacks towards victims by these movements and the failure of the system.  Something needs to be done about this.

The contradictions that relay in their mantras are often that on one hand, they are all falsely accused and on the other they make accusations against their ex wives.  They all say that. "people lie in the family court and you can get away with saying anything".  So how do they know such a perspective?  Have they had practice?  If there is anything, scholars and court officials have learned from the fathers rights plights is that these types lie a lot and believe that they can make anyone believe anything.  Some even receive quite a lot of gratification from it, believing that they could get away with murder as they could convince the public that children and women's lives are not as valuable as theirs, reflective of the white supremacy values.  They lost their african american, aboriginal and asians as scapegoats so they come after the women and children with a vengeance.  

The largest disgrace of their work is that they used statistics of male suicide that are often from these cultures to fuel an already supreme existence.  Whilst the world is crumbling beneath their feet, they reach for the branch of denial that their fathers and the fathers before them failed the world with its industrial revolution and "head of the family" consuming all in its path and they still haven't learned the old lesson of what greed for money and power reaps.