How the courts concoct abuse as something to ignore...

1. The  judge will ask the parent if they have ever left the child alone with the alleged abuser, whether it was just to get some milk. 
2. The evaluator/consultant/family reporter will test the closeness of the child and mother to indicate parent alienation.  Breast-feeding has even been used as an indicator.
3. In cases of domestic violence, an uncredited psychological theory that there is two categories of domestic violence one being "situational violence" and the other being "intimate terrorism"  If it has been one or two evidential occasions, it is classed as "situational violence" and treated as an unimportant event.
4. They do not make assessments from outside court experts.
5. The obtaining of evidence is criticized as vindictive or even abusive.
6. The lawyers threaten to remove the child if you persist with the allegation.
7. Services that assist child are not allowed to get involved in assisting during and after family court cases.  
8. Human rights does not cover family law.
9. Evidence snatching is common.
10. Child services are not allowed to intervene.
11. Evaluators initially investigate the mental well being and upon findings of distress, is routinely interpreted as "Hysteria", "Anxiety" or even "borderline personality disorder"
12. Costs to survivors of domestic violence are threatened.
13. Upon findings of domestic violence, the survivor is blamed for the children witnessing the violence and not being able to leave.
14. Evaluators, lawyers and judges deliberately use triggers to re abuse the survivor.
15. Children are told not to raise their concerns of child abuse or that it never happened and induce shame on the victims.
16. Mediators have been known to hold survivors of violence until they sign consent.
17. They use the perpetrators accounts as evidence against the child and the mother.