The Burden Of Proof Sends The Child To The Abuser

Above, are the faces of Children and mothers that died as a result of a court order.  There were signs, outcries and there was also the suppression...

An Article in Perth Now Grossly misrepresenting the plight of protective parents and abused children, is just an example of how The Family Court attempts to blanket the closet of extreme negligence under the guise of "False Allegations". The mother is painted as a player in entrenched conflict obsessed in shaming the father:

"Her other unfounded claims included that their father suffered Asperger's Syndrome, locked the children in a dairy alone, had no electricity, fridge, television, telephone, hot water or toilet paper. "

 It was a really good attempt to persuade readers that all protective parents who make efforts to obtain evidence of child abuse are crazy.  Janet Fife-Yeomans, has been nominated for our Duped by an abuser award.  Not only did she condemn a mother who was trying to save her child - she did exactly the same thing:

"Three days earlier he abused another journalist, who took his picture at the shopping centre.

As Janet Fife-Yeomans from The Australian told 3AW‰S Neil Mitchell:

Janet Fife-Yeomans: Stan got very angry.

Neil Mitchell: What did he say?

Janet: Well he started on about um, ah, that I was invading their privacy, which I actually thought was very funny, um, compared to what his program does, I thought it was a bit hypocritical, and while I didn't really want to get into an argument with him, um, but I did keep taking his picture- ah..

Neil: What, while, while he was abusing you?

Janet: Yes.

Neil: (laughing) Ok yes.

Janet: I'm a journalist! 

Neil: yes (laughs)

Janet: He then, he um, asked if I was proud to go home to my husband and children, you know, having done something like this, "Oh are you proud to go home to your family tonight are you? Proud to go home to your husband and children?" and of course there's an obvious retort to that.

Neil: "At least I'm going home to my family", yup.
(Radio 3AW Neil Mitchell 17/8/00)hree days earlier he abused another journalist, who took his picture at the shopping centre.

It is becoming well known regardless of the secrecy law section 121 of the Family Court that children are being abused and the court goes to extreme lengths to not only portray the parent and the child as liars - but they also punish them too.  Meanwhile these abusers are not only getting off scott free - they are given legal permission.  Child Protection all well known for not investigating in cases and there is a long list of child deaths as a result.  The parent, often the mother is solely burdened in obtaining evidence against the abuser.  The fact that this is portrayed as "absurd" raises a great question about how child abuse supportive our society has become.   It also stated about the mother:

"She once paraded poster-sized photographs of bruised body parts of her children, including their genitals, outside the local post office with a large sign that said: "Don't support child abuse."  

This story is clearly bias in its strong support of the family courts rogue tactics against protective parents.  In US where some states allow media coverage on Family Court cases, the accounts are horrific and the children's accounts of how the courts did not listen are at an epidemic level and does not just remain in that country but a silent institutionalized human rights violation not only against women but also against children.  With the Australian trend of censorship favoring institutions, it is no wonder mothers are up to their tether on negligence toward their children and breaking out against the secrecy law in hope that the outrage may change these abhorrent crimes.  These mothers despite the threats of imprisonment, isolation from their children are heros and one day humanity will look back at this a dark time in history for children and women.  The only thing that probably entrenched her situation further might have been because she did not put it up on youtube and utilized a wide range of resources that is becoming a growing amount of physical evidence of the courts.  If every mother, father and child went against the secrecy laws - the system could not handle it and thus would crash from the ambiguity.  Most mothers who are jailed are often political prisoners for daring to go against a system that orders death sentences.  If you are in Australia, please join the parents and children in a rally against this.